| | k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 |    |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
s.e.a.n
STREET KING
Number of posts: 1113
Registration date: 2009-03-09
|  Subject: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06  July 27th 2010, 9:10 am | |
| |
|
| | |
Stockness
Newbie
Number of posts: 97
Location: Miami
Registration date: 2009-10-27
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 9:30 am | |
| |
|
| | |
TheCrusherCobra
STREET LORD
Number of posts: 3444
Registration date: 2010-05-10
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 9:49 am | |
| I'll say that Vette Its making probably 600WHP Or less!!! But Good run For the Civic!!
What Roll Was that? |
|
| | |
Krusty DSM
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 338
Location: FTL
Registration date: 2009-03-01
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 10:39 am | |
| | TheCrusherCobra wrote: | I'll say that Vette Its making probably 600WHP Or less!!! But Good run For the Civic!!
What Roll Was that? |
I highly doubt it was under 700hp the vette. |
|
| | |
TheCrusherCobra
STREET LORD
Number of posts: 3444
Registration date: 2010-05-10
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 10:49 am | |
| That STS Turbo kit for the Vette> Its not the best shit Out There!! They go Mounted In the back> And thats A major underperformance for the Car!!! the boost has to travel A long way to make It into the Intake manifold and Start To produce power.. So The STS Turbo kit, to me Its a waste Of money. |
|
| | |
BlackMambaLS3
STREET KING
Number of posts: 1693
Location: M.i.Ya.Yo.
Registration date: 2009-01-30
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 11:07 am | |
| | TheCrusherCobra wrote: | | That STS Turbo kit for the Vette> Its not the best shit Out There!! They go Mounted In the back> And thats A major underperformance for the Car!!! the boost has to travel A long way to make It into the Intake manifold and Start To produce power.. So The STS Turbo kit, to me Its a waste Of money. |
i finally agree with u in something..  |
|
| | |
Krusty DSM
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 338
Location: FTL
Registration date: 2009-03-01
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 11:14 am | |
| I know how the STS kit works and how its made im not the biggest fan but it does work and they are way capable of making over 600. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]This corvette has the turbos in the back and its a drag radial car  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]i know you enjoy videos lol |
|
| | |
Krusty DSM
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 338
Location: FTL
Registration date: 2009-03-01
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 11:17 am | |
| | 4DR SALOON wrote: | I know how the STS kit works and how its made im not the biggest fan but it does work and they are way capable of making over 600.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
This corvette has the turbos in the back and its a drag radial car
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
i know you enjoy videos lol |
This car has broken 6s on Radials btw
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] |
|
| | |
Krusty DSM
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 338
Location: FTL
Registration date: 2009-03-01
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 11:28 am | |
| What im getting at is for that z06 to stay kinda close to that civic it doesn't make under 700 i wouldnt think being as this was a highway roll and the civic is still 800+lbs lighter. |
|
| | |
s.e.a.n
STREET KING
Number of posts: 1113
Registration date: 2009-03-09
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 11:47 am | |
| | 4DR SALOON wrote: | | What im getting at is for that z06 to stay kinda close to that civic it doesn't make under 700 i wouldnt think being as this was a highway roll and the civic is still 800+lbs lighter. |
No you're wrong. The vette is probably making 600whp or less  |
|
| | |
BlackMambaLS3
STREET KING
Number of posts: 1693
Location: M.i.Ya.Yo.
Registration date: 2009-01-30
| |
| | |
MRxSLAYx
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 875
Registration date: 2009-01-31
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 1:31 pm | |
| Damn thats kicking puppies. That vette lost to Mikes Lambo, Which is a 143 car max. Vette did really good considering its only a 140-143mph car |
|
| | |
Krusty DSM
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 338
Location: FTL
Registration date: 2009-03-01
| |
| | |
asap1320
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 527
Location: Dania Beach
Registration date: 2010-03-20
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 1:45 pm | |
| | MRxSLAYx wrote: | | Damn thats kicking puppies. That vette lost to Mikes Lambo, Which is a 143 car max. Vette did really good considering its only a 140-143mph car |
i wouldnt assume because a car lost by however many lengths that you know how fast it is.
you never know what people are holding back or when they make changes.
i could beat a mercedes by a car and a cbr600 by a car. so how fast is it? |
|
| | |
MRxSLAYx
Professional Street Racer
Number of posts: 875
Registration date: 2009-01-31
| | Subject: Re: k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 July 27th 2010, 1:57 pm | |
| | asap1320 wrote: | | MRxSLAYx wrote: | | Damn thats kicking puppies. That vette lost to Mikes Lambo, Which is a 143 car max. Vette did really good considering its only a 140-143mph car |
i wouldnt assume because a car lost by however many lengths that you know how fast it is.
you never know what people are holding back or when they make changes.
i could beat a mercedes by a car and a cbr600 by a car. so how fast is it? |
Its simple... Fastest Heffner Lambo is a 145mph car. No matter how you look at it your comparing a 140mph car to a 150mph car. |
|
| | |
| | k20 Turbo civic v.s. Turbo Z06 | |
|
